Friday, February 28, 2014

Lulu for LULU

WARNING! MEN, DO NOT READ!!!
 

The hot pink logo with the seductively written letter "L" in the center, has become both a controversial and adored topic for many who have uploaded it. Known as "Lulu", this mobile app allows females who are connected to Facebook to grade males on topics such as their sex appeal, humor, first kiss, ambition, & commitment. Along with that, woman are also able to hash tag any negative or positive pre-downloaded saying to describe the men they are reviewing, including: #epicsmile #knowshowtotreatwoman  #smokeslikeachimney #cheaperthanabigmac  #bigfeet   #questionablesearchhistory
 
The app  "Lulu" allows only female users to access its pages (sorry guys), and everything that is posted is anonymous. The idea of the app is to help woman come together in an environment where they can discuss or let their frustrations & positive experiences out regarding their relationships with men. Having a publically known grading scale, helps woman find which men are worth it or who should be tossed to the curb.
 
That being said, the app "LuLu" has been very controversial. Many state that this is an unfair medium to use on our male counterparts and it is a degrading and fowl way for women to express their personal thoughts and feelings. The stereotypical ways of looking at men are highlighted by using the app, and no matter which way someone sees a review, they are going to focus more on the negative characteristics of someone rather than the positive. 

What are your thoughts on this app, do you think its fair?
Do you think people should use this app?
Do you think men should have an app just like LULU, where they can grade woman?
 
 
To read more about LULU, check out these articles:

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jul/14/business/la-fi-tn-lulu-the-womenonly-app-for-rating-dates-20130711

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/21/fashion/social-networking-App-allows-women-to-rate-men.html

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/08/22/meet-lulu-an-app-that-lets-girls-rate-guys-anonymously.html

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyclay/2013/11/24/why-we-should-all-be-scared-of-lulu-app/


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sam-ressler/lulu-the-worst-app_b_4340750.html




Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Color Wheel

When your standing in the middle of Lowes, trying to pick out a new color to paint your room for your new "college groove", do you ever wonder what that color might symbolize? What it might say about you? Your character? Your style? ... I know I do. A lot goes into color coordination, and choosing the right shades that reflect on your own personality. If you know what I'm talking about, here's a quick chart to help you find out what color best suits you.
Red Orange Yellow Green Blue Purple
Red is the color of fire and blood, so it is associated with energy, war, danger, strength, power, determination as well as passion, desire, and love. Orange combines the energy of red and the happiness of yellow. It is associated with joy, sunshine, and the tropics. Orange represents enthusiasm, fascination, happiness, creativity, determination, attraction, success, encouragement, and stimulation. Yellow is the color of sunshine. It's associated with joy, happiness, intellect, and energy. Green is the color of nature. It symbolizes growth, harmony, freshness, and fertility. Green has strong emotional correspondence with safety. Dark green is also commonly associated with money. Blue is the color of the sky and sea. It is often associated with depth and stability. It symbolizes trust, loyalty, wisdom, confidence, intelligence, faith, truth, and heaven. Purple combines the stability of blue and the energy of red. Purple is associated with royalty. It symbolizes power, nobility, luxury, and ambition. It conveys wealth and extravagance. Purple is associated with wisdom, dignity, independence, creativity, mystery, and magic.
Info on colors came from: http://www.color-wheel-pro.com/color-meaning.html

Sunday, February 23, 2014

If Only My High School Offered Helpful Programs ...


Like I have mentioned in a few of my other blog posts, I'm not very good with computers. The everyday uses of word, excel, and power point are pretty easy, but everything else from software updating to typing I need to improve on. I still need to look down at the key board every once and a while to be able to type a full sentence, and it still takes me few minutes to search through my computers database if I want to make a style change on my desktop. I also had the opportunity to work with the program called InDesign last semester for an internship, which I conclude as completely impossible to work with (at least for me); and HTML codes are like a whole different language. Oh, and I just downloaded Firefox like 3 months ago....

The only thing I could think of while reading Cynthia Selfe's book "Technology and Literacy in the Twenty-First century" was that it would have been extremely beneficial to have a computer education program in grade school & high school while I was attending. If there was, then I would have entered college with the knowledge of using a mac instead of having to guess around until I got it right, using the trial and error method. I also would of been well adjusted to software programs that I clearly have no clue about.

If I remember correctly, there was only one class in high school that I took that was centered around computers and working with them. However, the majority of its lessons were just basic typing. We had to see how many words we could type in an hour long class, or something like that. Copying what's on a screen isn't that difficult either, and rather boring - so my skills weren't really progressing.

Today, kindergartens are being introduced to laptops. Therefore, creating & learning early, a new literacy of technology through computers along with basic speech and written skills. While our society and knowledge of these technological changes advance, so does our need & ability to teach it. We have to educate those who are lucky enough to be a part of this 21st century so that they can survive through it, because those of us who were stuck in the transitional stage are having a hard time figuring everything out.

I'm not a fan of everything being on the computer or at a touch of a button, but I am slowly beginning to adapt to it. Now, If only I could get my parents to do the same.

My Experience With Cyber Bullying

In the first few days of this class, we argued over whether the internet makes us smarter or dumber, or if society really is better off with advanced technological equipment like the World Wide Web. Personally, I grew up in a home that wasn't really tech savvy, and my skills on a laptop or computer are far from acceptable. Truth be told, I'm not a fan of technology at all, or the hype that follows it. Do I think it helps the movement of communication and knowledge? Yes. At the same time however, I think its harming it. My most biggest problem though, strictly when it comes to the internet & computer, is cyber bullying.

Stopbullying.gov defines cyber bullying as: "bullying that takes place using electronic technology. Electronic technology includes devices and equipment such as cell phones, computers, and tablets as well as communication tools including social media sites, text messages, chat, and websites.
Examples of cyberbullying include mean text messages or emails, rumors sent by email or posted on social networking sites, and embarrassing pictures, videos, websites, or fake profiles".

The problem with cyber bullying is that it can happen at any point of the day. Instead of those few hours in class, a person can be attacked 24-7. Whether they realize its happening or not, alone or with a group, the effects are much larger when the bullying can be constant. Another huge problem with cyber bullying, is the ability to post anonymously. People who are being abused through the internet can't even see who's saying what or why. A persons confidence, and being as a whole can be extremely effected by harassment through social media outlets.

This issue really hits home for me.

When I was a freshman here at SUNY Potsdam, my initial interests fell into Greek Life. I immediately started hanging out with houses, trying to present the best version of myself so that I could be accepted into their own tightly woven family's, and I rushed for an entire semester. Throughout that semester however, I hit a wall of devastation that hit me so hard, I nearly dropped out of college.

 The site was called acbcollege.com. It was a website forum that allowed college students from across the US to post anonymous discussions about people, gossip, places, or any-other college related activity happening.


My name was the 4th one on the list under SUNY Potsdam.

Anonymous sayings of how weird, unattractive, and mean I was filled the page in front of me. People had this idea that I was a spy for the president of the school & that I was going to bring down Greek Life from the inside if I were to be accepted into a house. It's repercussions were crazy. I was shunned from every house I was interested in, I wasn't allowed into parties, and the people who I thought were becoming my friends left instantly.  My name was even brought up in Potsdam's All Greek Council meeting, as a general announcement to watch out for me.

My confidence was completely shot. I remember just reading the posts over and over again. I had just gotten to Potsdam. It was supposed to be a place where I could start over from high school. Be someone completely new. And there I was crying my eyes out and thinking about dropping out come December. I had gotten so depressed one night after reading fresh posts of the day, that I requested to talk to someone from the Wellness Advocate program here at Potsdam.

That's when my luck turned around. It just so happened that the Wellness Advocate that came to talk to me was a part of Greek Life. A member of the Sigma Gamma Phi Sorority, aka Arethusa - she assured me that this would eventually blow over, and if it didn't, to screw the other houses and come meet hers. Long story short, I in-fact did meet her house, they accepted me, and I have now been a proud member since Spring 2011.

That moment of realization, that moment of panic and no sense of control however, have yet to leave my memory. I can still look at a computer and go back to that week where I discovered that I was the title of a chat forum, and that people were actually posting terrible things about me. People I either didn't know or who I thought were my friends. It was one of the worst experiences of my life, a real nightmare.


acbcollege.com was taken offline in October 2011.

Today, I write this not hating Greek Life anymore. Instead I am a strong member of it, however, I hate that people relied on cyber bullying as a way to try and keep me out. People have no idea the effects It has on those who are being attacked. And the fact that things are anonymous makes it worse. I would not wish what I went through onto anyone. It is like the whole world is against you. People feed off others on the internet, other posts, others sayings....

So excuse me as I say fuck the internet for cyber bullying, because it does bring better communication skills and a faster way for news to spread.

In the process - it also breaks people down to the point where they cant do anything  but loose themselves.


Sunday, February 16, 2014

Medical Nightmare


Skimming through the many aisles of books in Barnes & Noble today, I stumbled upon a novel that reminded me of this class and the ever-evolving technology that surrounds us. Written by New York Times bestselling author Robin Cook, Cell, is structured around a media advanced world where the uses of apps have taken over basic needs of society, including medical procedures, surgeries, and even diagnosis.
 


When the protagonists, George Wilson, fiancĂ©e dies after participating in a trial test for a new medical app called iDoc, his suspicions arise on whether the system has been altered by hackers. From there, an idea of a government conspiracy surfaces, death tolls increase, and a true medical thriller begins...
 

My question or interest lies within this well-beyond decade of technology; what if there is a time where technology like this actually exists? Where this fiction novel is instead a history book, is it really possible?

I remember a class I took sophomore year; I forget the name, where we discussed the future of technology. One student said that computers are going to become so advanced that they will be able to teach themselves and the level of knowledge will well-exceed what we as people can conceive and understand.

That’s a terrifying thought.

I immediately go into Terminator mode, scared of the future cyborgs that could take over the planet…  



… as much as I love my cell phone, I think an app like iDoc is unnecessary. Machines don’t feel, and they can’t sympathize with people. They don’t understand the importance of life like a human does.

Needless to say, I didn’t end up buying this book, but it is on my top 5 things to read next. Instead I went for a love story between a photographer & a roofer: still life with bread crumbs, by Anna Quindlen.

 

This blog post is to just get you all thinking, is this really even a possibility for the future?

And if so, what are your thoughts on it, if it were true?


 

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Not So Lucky

Urban Dictionary refers to HTML or "Horrible Typing Madness Language",  as a computer web language code used to program websites which has a high tendency to make you go insane, and I couldn't agree more. For someone who has never really seen HTML,  it's complex inscriptions and symbols make it extremely hard to learn.

 
In the process of reading the first few chapters of Julie C Melon's book Sam's Teach Yourself HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, it was like I was a deer in headlights. Confused and a little nervous to see how much of an outcome of this classes grades would reflect on this learning - I am still skeptical. However, I do understand its importance and see the interesting aspects intended. To make a website out of just coding is awesome, and the fact that there is even a cyber type language out there that people can understand and sort of communicate with is really really intriguing. If a site isn't interesting enough or have photos or things that make me want to stop and read for a second, its wasting my time - and the only way to have those things is through HTML. I give a lot of credit to those who are skilled in creating their own web designs, realizing that I, am not so fortunate.

 
With my specific blog, I do not think I will be using HTML very much. We have all the tools already programmed into the site. I can upload videos and pictures, and play with where I locate things and the spacing between them.. If anything, I would just use it to pick a different font size or style. I also would like to focus my blog on more of my actual writing's rather than the fancy things around it. It's almost like a personal diary isn't it? Only on a screen rather on paper....

I will however, practice on other applications like notepad, text wrangler, etc. Hopefully I will get the hang of HTML, learn to love it, and am able to use it in my future endeavors.







Sunday, February 9, 2014

What NOT to post on Social Media

It didn’t really happen if you didn't Facebook or Instagram it.
Read more at http://www.relevantmagazine.com/culture/tech/3-things-stop-posting-social-media#iv2Zomx86PeLjpq6.99
It didn’t really happen if you didn't Facebook or Instagram it.
Read more at http://www.relevantmagazine.com/culture/tech/3-things-stop-posting-social-media#iv2Zomx86PeLjpq6.99
"It didn't really happen if you didn't Facebook or Instagram it"

At least this is what John Weirick states in his article 3 Things to Stop Posting on Social Media for Relevant Magazine. He believes that our lives are becoming "less and less separate from the interactions we have on digital platforms." That we are revolving all of our conversations on what has been posted or tweeted recently rather than our morning jog or everyday work. - and I agree with him.


 

I have been guilty of this trait: looking on Facebook to see the juicy gossip and talking about it with my friends...hell, I think everyone has done it at least once in their lives. But the problem with this issue is our physical self vs. our digital self. Should we really be posting as much as we are online for the world to see? Shouldn't people want to get to know the actual me rather than the few updates I post every few weeks? Who cares how I feel or what I'm doing, don't people have better things to do other than creep me on Facebook (granted, my pics are pretty sweet). The point of this whole article, this blog, is to get people to really consider what they put online.

We, as students, about to enter the real world are told almost everyday to watch the photo's we choose to put up. That future employers will be looking at us, and that one photo doing tequila shots on the bar will come back and bite us in the ass someday. Or that post with all the swear words because you were pissed off at your roommate will re-surface and start a whole new argument with a bunch of different people it didn't originate with. There are definitely some "unhealthy ways to post things online" says Weirick.

The article continues on with a sarcastic tone of specific things people really shouldn't post online, like emotions, endless love letters to boyfriends/girlfriends and posting the same things over and over again. As active social media goers ourselves, we know them all. We have all either witnessed them or are guilty of committing them ourselves.












































Now, today, this moment, is our time to realize that our physical lives, our private lives shouldn't be 100% for the public to know about on social media. That there are certain aspects of our lives that are meant to stay private. We need a gap, a distance between our 2 beings, or we are all going to get lost in each other, and stop focusing on ourselves. Everyone can start small, like trying not to tweet for a whole 24 hours. People shouldn't be focused of getting to know your digital selves. Instead, they should want to get to know out actual selves, to want to hangout in person rather than follow our pages or check our newsfeeds.


 
 
 
It didn’t really happen if you didn't Facebook or Instagram it.
Read more at http://www.relevantmagazine.com/culture/tech/3-things-stop-posting-social-media#iv2Zomx86PeLjpq6.99

Creating Reality

In November of 1979, Barry Brummett wrote an article propositioning that "rhetoric is epistemic." By using three key meanings, methodological, sociological, and ontological, Brummett wove his way through "multiple conceptions of reality, knowledge and communication."
 

This being said, the theory that I agree with the most when it comes to looking at his article from the stand point of "Writing in a Digital Age" is Ontological. This idea that - "...rhetoric creates all of what there is to know. Discourse does not merely discover truth or make it effective. Discourse creates realities rather than truths about realities."  - fits perfectly into the 21st century and how people are communicating with one another through media outlets and new found technologies. People today are creating their own realities, their own forms of truth that they choose to believe rather than just going along with what they hear. The internet has made it possible to search for  possible truths and a way to release our feelings through public texts how we feel about them.
 
I look at the internet as a gateway to whatever we want it to be. It can be a Sunday night movie, a research tool the night before a big paper is due, a second reality through online books, or even a phone call through Facebook or Skype. It is our second realities, our second cyber worlds, and with it comes new guidelines, new knowledge or teachings, and new ways to communicate with one another. "The ontological view posits rhetoric as a dimension of all activity rather than as an activity in its own right." The internet is a dimension of all activity including communicating, learning, expressing, and arguing. So yes, I definitely can see how this specific point in Brummett's article could reflect back into our class.
 




The article was, however, a very difficult read (personally). I've only taken one psychological class here at Potsdam and a lot of the terminology was hard to follow, making my thoughts on the article hard to pin point down directly at first. I'm hoping that we stick to more hand's on things in the future and let the theories stay with the experts - this article was far from a favorite of mine.  
 
 
 

Sunday, February 2, 2014

Jennifer Lawrence

Celebrities.

We know who they are, what entertainment they associate themselves with, and just about everything else going on in their lives.

But why?

Isn't there better things to focus on or do with our lives rather than watch these people on TV or add them on social media networks like Twitter or Facebook. Who cares if Jennifer Lawrence just won a golden globe? Doesn't change my life any, does it?

                          _________________________________________________


Trevor Blank, author of the book "The Last Laugh", try's to explain the relationships formed between celebrities and everyday society members through media outlets such as the internet and the television.

Blank calls celebrities "Intimate Strangers", and describes these relationships as imaginary for those of us who are plugged into the 21st century. These so called "connections" that we make between celebrities and ourselves aren't even at face-value. However, like when we see a friend walk down the hallway or sit next to someone in class, when we decide to friend a celebrity on twitter or instagram - its connecting us just the same.

Also, the chances of us actually talking to celebrities through these media outlets is slim. Whether its really them on the other side of the digital continuum writing back to our demands/praises or if its  one of their many employers, hired to continuously update their media accounts - we will never know.

I like to think that there are two separate worlds out there today, a physical and cyber world. I have my friends here at college and at home that I talk to and get to see everyday, which are my physical relationships. Then I have the celebrities and even businesses that I follow and keep up to date with - my cyber relations.

However, celebrities unattainability in our own personal physical world causes us to get to know them the only way we know how: through the digital world. Not caring if the information is 100% accurate or not, we are still connected to these certain highly known individuals through a medium.

Combining them.

Our relationships, change, and the way we represent ourselves is different online then in person, so our relations with celebrities through the media should be accepted and understood. By friending them on these internet networks or watching them on TV,  once again, they act as entry points to  our physical worlds.

                       _______________________________________________________

It does change my life.

She won a golden globe, therefore, I am going to watch more of her movies & follow her twitter feed daily: changing the course of my day-to-day activities. I am building our relationship into a friendship through media outlets.

Even if it is all just a lie.

She's my Intimate Stranger.